Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Help For Easy-PC Users
 PCB Layout
 Layer Colours
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

edrees

United Kingdom
786 Posts

Posted - 29 Jan 2018 :  11:50:33  Show Profile  Visit edrees's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Can someone please advise me before I pull all my (remaining) hair out?
New V21.0.3 pcb design.

I have a double sided s/mount component design and have added a Top Solder Paste Layer and a Bottom Solder Paste Layer (along with top & bottom resist layers). Problem is in the PCB Editor, the Top and Bottom solder paste layers take on the colour of [Top] or [Bottom] colours and not the colours I've specified for the Top & Bottom Paste layers in the Display => Layers and Layer Spans, or in the Settings, =>Design Tech=>Layers. The dockable Layers window shows both Solder Paste layers in the colours I would expect. The top & bottom resist colours are as I would expect.

By comparison with an "old" pcb design with identical(?) set-up shows the solder paste colours in the colour I've specified and not in the [Top] or [Bottom] colours. What's changed? Any pointers gratefully received. Thanks.


Iain Wilkie

United Kingdom
1019 Posts

Posted - 29 Jan 2018 :  21:12:30  Show Profile  Visit Iain Wilkie's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Ed,

I came across this (or similar) a few versions ago. I spoke to Peter Johnston about it where he did give me an explanation but for the life of me I can’t remember the reasons. However there was a work around and I’m not sure if there was meant to be a fix. I do seem to remember everything seemed to correct itself after a bit of faffing around.
I would Phone Peter and run it past him.

Iain

Edited by - Iain Wilkie on 29 Jan 2018 21:23:57
Go to Top of Page

Peter Johnson

United Kingdom
510 Posts

Posted - 30 Jan 2018 :  10:29:14  Show Profile  Visit Peter Johnson's Homepage  Reply with Quote
This is one of those rabbit holes you trip over which with 20/20 hindsight seems obvious. As a rule, paste is smaller than the pad, so it tends to be obliterated by the pad. The problem is that because the pad is layer [Top], the basic pad is valid on all [Top] layers, so you have to make sure that the paste layer is above any others that include the pad. The silk screen is OK to be above as it doesn't show pads, but it's easy to overlook a 'Wire' layer if present, as this does.

Also remember that if you use the 'Reverse Layer Order' function, the same issue will arise purely because the paste layers are now lower than the electrical ones.
Go to Top of Page

edrees

United Kingdom
786 Posts

Posted - 30 Jan 2018 :  17:39:02  Show Profile  Visit edrees's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Thank you Peter for your answer, and I can see where you are coming from. However, how do I get the (top) solder paste "above" the "top" pad of the component? The Layer "stack" is correct (Design Tech=>Layers), with Top Solder Paste higher up the list than the (top copper) pad. I can't place the the "Side" of the top solder paste higher than Top as the choice can only be Top/Inner/Bottom. My design does not feature a "Wire" layer.

Also this does not explain why my "old" pcb (designed with V20 ) with exactly the same(?) Design Tech appears OK in the PCB editor. I'm afraid I can't see what's different!




Edited by - edrees on 30 Jan 2018 17:40:20
Go to Top of Page

edrees

United Kingdom
786 Posts

Posted - 31 Jan 2018 :  08:44:30  Show Profile  Visit edrees's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Sorted! The Solder Paste layer cannot be equal in size to the pad. If the Solder Paste is "Oversized" SMALLER (or LARGER!) than the pad, it appears as I would expect. I can now see the resist, the pad and the solder paste as three separate colours. If the Solder Paste layer "Oversize" is set to "None", the Solder Paste colour disappears.
Thanks to Iain & Peter, - a small system "bug" for EasyPC to resolve?
Go to Top of Page

Scazon

United Kingdom
67 Posts

Posted - 08 Feb 2018 :  16:37:50  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
More layer colours not behaving as desired... whatever colour I select for bottom side pads, they are displayed in pale blue. Grand for Cambridge types with a Henry Ford temperament I suppose. It's done this for a few versions, and I can't remember when it started because I don't often put components on the back. Not a show stopper but an annoyance.
Go to Top of Page

edrees

United Kingdom
786 Posts

Posted - 08 Feb 2018 :  16:46:50  Show Profile  Visit edrees's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Because [Bottom] is set to Light Blue with you and "overrides" the Bottom Copper (track) colour. It is behaving correctly (IMHO). I can get brown bottom tracks and orange bottom pads displaying as I would expect.
Go to Top of Page

Peter Johnson

United Kingdom
510 Posts

Posted - 09 Feb 2018 :  10:25:19  Show Profile  Visit Peter Johnson's Homepage  Reply with Quote
You beat me to it!

Essentially, the [All], [Top], and [Bottom] pseudo layers have their own colour definitions. The only place to see these easily is on the 'Layers and Layer Spans' tab under [View], [Display]. You can also override the colours used for individual cells, but the layer colour won't update to reflect this unless you change the whole row.
Go to Top of Page

Scazon

United Kingdom
67 Posts

Posted - 10 Feb 2018 :  21:06:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Happen it is. But in that case why is there a setting for "sym pads" in Display? What does it do?
Go to Top of Page

edrees

United Kingdom
786 Posts

Posted - 11 Feb 2018 :  14:50:01  Show Profile  Visit edrees's Homepage  Reply with Quote
The (rainbow) Display drop down menus (Layers & Layer Spans and Settings and Highlights) are a bit confusing and not very intuitive. (who uses Pads on Top/Bottom silk screen?). In my opinion there are too many settings to figure out, but Sod's Law dictates that if some were removed, I'd want them available for the next job!
I have played with this feature for some time and now can get to see everything I need for every job within the PCB Editor.
Go to Top of Page

Peter Johnson

United Kingdom
510 Posts

Posted - 12 Feb 2018 :  12:11:55  Show Profile  Visit Peter Johnson's Homepage  Reply with Quote
If you look at this dialogue when editing a pcb symbol, you'll find that there's only a 'Pads' column. However, within a design, you've got 'Pads' and 'Sym. Pads', referring to 'free' pads, and pads which are part of a component. Separating these into two categories increases the flexibility when it comes to configuring display and selection.

Regarding the table options - although pads are not normally part of a silk screen, there is a sneaky trick where pads are temporarily enabled in the silk screen layer type as a quick and dirty way of converting the silk to an assembly drawing. With a dialogue which is already necessarily complex (the more so because vias have to be split off because of needing to support layer spans), arbitrarily hiding pad options because the relevant layer type hides them would, in my personal opinion, be even more confusing!

Remember that if you get stuck, <F1> brings up the context-sensitive help.


Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Jump To: